Archive for the ‘Verbal’ Category

GMAT: Fragments and Run-Ons

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

The GMAT Sentence Correction commonly tests run-on sentences and fragments. Let’s review some of the definitions so you can quickly spot them.

A clause is a group of words with a verb and a subject.

An independent clause can stand alone as a complete sentence. When two or more independent clauses are inappropriately joined, it is called a run-on.

A dependent or subordinate clause lacks either a subject or a predicate verb, or does not express a complete thought. When a dependent clause is not attached to an independent clause it is called a fragment.

An easy way to think of run-ons and fragments is that a run-on sentence has too much information while a fragment doesn’t have enough.

Run-on: I have been studying for the GMAT for three months, I hope to score a 750+.

Fragment: Hoping to do well on my test.

The run-on example is called a comma splice. Two sentences have been improperly joined with a comma.

The fragment is a dependent clause. It is missing a subject and predicate verb. To fix the fragment, we would need to add an independent clause or the missing information.

Hoping to do well on my test, I went to sleep early the night before.

Sheila hopes to do well on her test.

To fix the run-on, we have three options. The most concise (and often the most correct) way is to change the comma to a semicolon.

I have been studying for the GMAT for three months; I hope to score a 750+.

We can also add a coordinating conjunction after the comma.

I have been studying for the GMAT for three months, and I hope to score a 750+.

Or we can make one clause dependent.

Hoping to score a 750+, I have been studying for the GMAT for three months.

Make sure that when one clause becomes dependent, it doesn’t introduce a modification error into the sentence. “Hoping to score a 750+” correcting modifies “I” so this sentence is correct.

Occasionally a run-on may be fixed by adding either a colon (:) or a dash (-). A colon is used to introduce a list, an explanation, or a quote. If the first independent clause is acting as an introduction, then adding a colon is acceptable.

I had everything I needed to start studying: my pen, scratch paper, and computer all sat on my desk.

A dash (-) indicates a sudden change in thought:

The GMAT was a piece of cake – or so I thought!

Once you spot a fragment or a run-on sentence on the GMAT, look for the answer choice that corrects the error without introducing a new one. Two answer choices may correctly fix a fragment, however one of them may be wordier, use passive voice, or introduce a new error. Make sure you are always choosing the best answer choice out of the options given, not just the first one that corrects the error!

Sentence Correction: General Strategies

Friday, August 20th, 2010

The Sentence Correction portion of the GMAT Verbal tests grammar and mechanics. About 15 of the 41 Verbal questions are SC, so SC constitutes the majority of the three verbal question types. With SC questions, you’ll be presented with a sentence, part of which or all of which is underlined. You’ll have five choices that rephrase the underlined portion, the first of which repeats the original. Your task, as expected, is to choose the best option. What does “best” mean in this case? According to the GMAT, the question tests “correctness and effectiveness of expression,” and you should pay attention to “grammar, choice of words, and sentence construction.” The answer should be “clear and exact, without awkwardness, ambiguity, redundancy, or grammatical error.”

That seems like a lot to ask, and indeed it is. Luckily, there is a limited number of specific errors that SC questions test, and it’s crucial to learn each one. Before you learn these common errors, though, you need to follow a certain plan of action. Here’s how to attack an SC, step by step:

1. Read the whole sentence slowly and carefully. We all have different reading speeds, but as a good rule of thumb, you’ll want to read the sentence significantly slower than you would read a novel. For you fast readers who don’t subvocalize as you read, you might want to try subvocalizing SC sentences; sometimes it’s best to hear the mistake rather than see it.

2. If you notice what looks like an error in the underlined portion, try to identify the type of error before you move on to the answer choices. Why? The test writers are clever, and many of the incorrect choices appear correct.

Remember, there are basically three ways an  answer can be wrong:

- It violates a grammar rule.

- Its wording is unclear.

- Its wording is nonstandard (these will often sound incorrect)

3. If the underlined portion appears correct, make note of it, but read every answer choice carefully before you rule it correct.

4. Examine answer choices individually. If you found an error in the original, eliminate choice A. If any of the answer choices repeat that error (and they often do), then eliminate those answers. Try to look for additional errors in the answer choices and spot other choices that repeat those errors. It’s imperative that you group answer choices together based on common errors; this strategy save you precious time.

If you were unable to find an error in the original sentence, search for errors in the answer choices to quickly eliminate them. In other words, when you can’t find the error in the original, never try to search for the correct sentence –always work by elimination. If you can spot errors in each choice, then you should choose A as the answer.

5. If you’re down to two choices that both seem fine, identify the differences between the sentences, and only examine these differences. The error will always lie in that portion.

A systematic method is just as necessary to solve SC’s as is knowledge of the grammar rules. Wrong answer choices are designed to be seductive, so firmly adhere to a system to get the job done.

GMAT Verb Tense Practice

Monday, August 16th, 2010

The general rule on GMAT Sentence Corrections is that verb tenses should stay consistent within a sentence, unless the sequence of events described in the sentence justifies a change in verb tense.  Last time, we saw a question in which verb tense plays a major role; let’s revisit that question.

The benefits of the teacher’s new academic achievement reward program are evident in the student’s grades, which increased by a full point this semester after it fell last semester.

  1. a. which increased by a full point this semester after it fell
  2. b. which had increased by a full point this semester after it had fallen
  3. c. which have increased by a full point this semester after falling
  4. d. with an increase of a full point this semester after falling
  5. e. with an increase of a full point this semester after having fallen

The sentence gives us some clues about our timeline; “are evident” shows us that we are in the present, for instance, and the sentence ends with “last semester,” so we know that the grades fell in the past.  Since we’re talking about an increase “this semester,” we need to use a present or present perfect version of “increase.”  We can rule out ‘a’ since it uses the past tense “increased,” and ‘b’ for its use of the past perfect “had increased.”  That leaves us with the last three choices, and to make that decision, we turn to the correct introduction of a modifying phrase.  The word “which” at the beginning of choice ‘c’ makes it clear that everything following it describes “grades,” and that’s the correct meaning.  Therefore, the answer here is ‘c.’

But what if you’re not confident with verb tense issues?  In that case, the first step in approaching this question is to eliminate as many choices as we can based on common grammar issues.  The pronoun “it” in the original sentence seems to refer to the student’s grades, but the plural “grades” doesn’t agree with the singular “it,” so any choice using that pronoun is eliminated.  That takes care of ‘a’ and ‘b’ and leaves us with ‘c,’ ‘d,’ and ‘e.’  Once again, we’re back to the modifier: both ‘d’ and ‘e’ begin with the phrase “with an increase,” and that phrase doesn’t make it clear that what follows it modifies “grades.”  That leaves us once more with ‘c.’

SC Spotlight: All-In-One Question 2 Explanation

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Thank you all for your participation in the most recent all-in-one question — dozens of responses within a day!  I’m glad to see you’re all so committed to your GMAT studies and interested in learning more; as you may have noticed, time you invest in any part of Verbal transfers to all the other Verbal tasks to various extents.   I’m sorry I don’t have prizes for you beyond the excitement of something different, perhaps the satisfaction of a job well done, and potentially a tiny contribution to a higher GMAT score — maybe someday I’ll have something tangible for you!

If you’re new to the all-in-ones, check out the question (link above) for background and then come back.  The answer choices explained:

A.  The storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned from a prison, by angry protesters on July 14, 1789 was the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and the inception of a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

The Bastille was a fortress first and a prison more recently; “from” reverses this order.  The modifying phrase beginning with “following” is setting up events that took place prior to the attack, but “the inception of a long period . . .” is meant to describe the attack, not an event before it.

B.  After the revolutionary formation of the National Assembly by angry protesters, then a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe were begun by the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, on July 14, 1789, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution.

Here angry protesters are the ones who formed the National Assembly, “then” subordinates what ought to be the main clause of a sentence, and the plural verb “were begun” does not agree with the singular “period.”

C.  Angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, and the beginning of a long period of much turmoil with France and throughout Europe on July 14, 1789.

I like this (wrong) answer choice because while it’s clearly wrong, it’s challenging to articulate why — apposition and modification may make a good blog post later.  Modifying phrases by default modify the thing they are closest to, but there are still rules.  You can add apposition — a parenthetical restatement of a word you just said, similar to this thing I’m typing right now — set off only by commas and without any additional marking words; you can even put several in a row (“George’s faithful dog Spot, terror of the postal service, stealer of bacon, and pursuer of squirrels, loved riding in the car more than anything”) modifying something prior.  Without additional participles, verbs, adverbs, or relative pronouns in front of each phrase after “prison” to suggest a structure, though, the phrases default to modifying “the Bastille.”

D.  A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe began on July 14th, 1789 along with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, when angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly.

“Along with” suggests that there were two parallel events, when in fact they are the same event.  The lack of a comma in D is undesirable because it suggests that the conversion from fortress to prison followed the formation of the National Assembly, when in fact that happened years before.  Commas are the difference between “I’m hungry! Let’s eat, Grandma!” and “I’m hungry!  Let’s eat Grandma!”

E.  After the revolutionary formation of the National Assembly, a long period of many turmoil within France and throughout Europe were begun by the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison by angry protesters on July 14, 1789, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution.

“Turmoil” is a non-count noun, and so should be modified with “much.”  “Were begun” is plural where “period” is singular.  Lack of an important comma strikes again, as this sentence indicates that the angry protesters are the ones who converted the fortress to a prison (not true).

F.  A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe had been begun July 14th, 1789 with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, when angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, an event after the dramatic formation of the National Assembly.

Past perfect tenses (“had been begun”) are used to indicate time prior to a past tense elsewhere in the sentence, but here the period of turmoil begins at the same time as the storming of the Bastille.  “An event after” is simply a wordier (and therefore GMAT-incorrect) version of “after.”

G.  The storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison by angry protesters on July 14, 1789, was the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and likewise beginning a long period of much turmoil not only within France and throughout Europe.

Angry protesters are industriously engaged in remodeling once more in choice G, and doing so right at the beginning of the French Revolution.  “And likewise” is wordy and unnecessary.

H.  The first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution was the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, by angry protesters on July14, 1789, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and beginning a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

In “real English” there’s no good reason to have a sentence this long and heavily modified, but this is correct.  You may also notice that it is mostly the same as choice I, but the ideas come in the opposite order.

I.  A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe began July 14th, 1789 with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution when, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison.

Some of you felt that “following the dramatic  formation of the National Assembly” is oddly placed — you are right, it’s a more complex sentence arrangement, but a correct one.  It looks less unusual in a shorter sentence:  “A bad time period started with a violent event when, following a political event, people did stuff to a building, a fortress made into a prison.”   As before, don’t write like this on the AWA.

J.  The first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution was the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, by angry protesters on July14, 1789, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, also a beginning of a long period of many turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

If “also a beginning” is parallel to anything, it’s parallel to “the National Assembly”, which wouldn’t make sense anyway.  “Many” makes another appearance in place of “much”.

Thank you so much for reading!  I have another one on the way, and I’ll have the answers scheduled closer to the post next time, sorry about the delay!

Idiom List

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

Idioms are the bane of GMAT prep for many students; the only way to know them is to memorize them, because objectively speaking, they don’t always make sense to non-native speakers, and there’s no real grammatical justification for some of the constructions aside from the idea that “that’s just how we say it.”  However, by reviewing those idioms deemed worthy of testing by the GMAC, you can get a jump-start on your GMAT Sentence Correction Practice.

Here for your edification we provide a list of idioms derived from the Official Guide for GMAT Review (12th Edition), the Official Guide for GMAT Review (11th Edition), and the Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review.  Make some flashcards, commit these to memory, and you should start to see an improvement in your sentence correction skills!  The question number, page number, and source text for each idiom is provided, so you can reference the original question for explanation of the context in which the idiom is used.

Y is more than Z (Question 4, pg. 686, Official Guide 12th Edition)

unlike Y, Z (Question 20, pg. 694, Official Guide 12th Edition)

in contrast with Y, Z (Question 20, pg. 694, Official Guide 12th Edition)

in contrast to Y, Z (Question 20, pg. 694, Official Guide 12th Edition)

estimate to be (Question 27, pg. 698, Official Guide 12th Edition)

the same to Y as to Z (Question 32, pg. 700, Official Guide 12th Edition)

depends on whether Y Question 34 , pg. 701, Official Guide 12th Edition)

so Y that Z (Question 37, pg. 702, Official Guide 12th Edition)

targeted … at (Question 40, pg. 704, Official Guide 12th Edition)

rivalry between Y and Z (Question  44, pg. 706, Official Guide 12th Edition)

expended on (Question  46, pgs. 706-707, Official Guide 12th Edition)

the ability … to (Question 51, pg. 710, Official Guide 12th Edition)

Y is to Z what B is to C (Question 58, pg. 714, Official Guide 12th Edition)

amount of Y (Question 74, pg. 722, Official Guide 12th Edition)

attributes Y to Z (Question 79, pg. 724, Official Guide 12th Edition)

not just because of Y, but because of Z (Question 83 pgs.726-727, Official Guide 12th Edition)

distinctions between Y and Z (Question 96, pg. 733, Official Guide 12th Edition)

either Y or Z (Question 109, pgs. 740-741, Official Guide 12th Edition)

to consider Y Z (Question  117, pg. 745, Official Guide 12th Edition)

less successful than (Question 123, pg. 748, Official Guide 12th Edition)

so Y that Z (Question  124 pgs. 748-749, Official Guide 12th Edition)

Y is dated at z years old (Question 140, pg. 756, Official Guide 12th Edition)

Y is more than Z (Question 2, pg. 662, Official Guide 11th Edition)

in contrast with Y, Z (Question 16, pg. 669, Official Guide 11th Edition)

estimated to be (Question 21, pg. 671, Official Guide 11th Edition)

in danger of (Question 27, pg. 673, Official Guide 11th Edition)

seem + infinitive (Question 29, pg. 674, Official Guide 11th Edition)

as much as (Question 30, pg. 674, Official Guide 11th Edition)

to credit Y with (Question 31, pg. 674, Official Guide 11th Edition)

as many … as (Question 37, pg. 676-677, Official Guide 11th Edition)

between Y and Z (Question40, pg. 678, Official Guide 11th Edition)

require Y to do Z (Question 53, pg. 684, Official Guide 11th Edition)

restrictions on Y (Question 54, pg. 684-685, Official Guide 11th Edition)

not only Y … but also Z (Question 55, pg. 685, Official Guide 11th Edition)

there is no doubt that (Question 58, pg. 687, Official Guide 11th Edition)

as a means to (Question 60, pg. 688, Official Guide 11th Edition)

attribute Y to Z (Question 67, pg. 691, Official Guide 11th Edition)

as many as (Question 76, pg. 695, Official Guide 11th Edition)

used Y as Z (Question 79, pg. 696, Official Guide 11th Edition)

not Y, but rather Z (Question 87, pg. 700, Official Guide 11th Edition)

order Y to be Z (Question 92, pg. 702, Official Guide 11th Edition)

just as Y, so Z (Question 99, pg. 706, Official Guide 11th Edition)

distinguish between Y and Z (Question 107, pg. 711, Official Guide 11th Edition)

both Y and Z (Question 112, pg. 713, Official Guide 11th Edition)

so Y that Z (Question 118, pg. 716, Official Guide 11th Edition)

not…but (Question 4, pg. 256, Verbal Review)

the rising cost (Question  8, pg. 258, Verbal Review)

range from Y to Z (Question 9, pg. 258 Verbal Review)

except for + noun (Question 13, 260, Verbal Review)

between Y and Z (Question 14, pg. 260, Verbal Review)

to mistake Y for Z (Question 17, pgs. 261-262, Verbal Review)

to think of Y as Z (Question 20, pgs. 262-263, Verbal Review)

aimed at Y (Question 25, pgs. 264-265, Verbal Review)

not only Y … but also Z (Question 46, pg. 274, Verbal Review)

prohibit Y from doing Z (Question 48, pg. 275, Verbal Review)

more Y than Z (Question 50, pg. 276, Verbal Review)

not only Y … but also Z (Question 52, pg. 277, Verbal Review)

so Y that Z (Question 58, pg. 280, Verbal Review)

not Y, but rather Z (Question 60, pg. 281, Verbal Review)

not only … but also (Question 66, pgs. 283-284, Verbal Review)

in order to Y (Question 69, pg. 285, Verbal Review)

as Y as (Question 75, pg. 288, Verbal Review)

worried about (Question 81, pg. 291, Verbal Review)

either Y or Z (Question 84, pg. 292, Verbal Review)

better served by Y than by Z (Question 89, pg. 295, Verbal Review)

ordered Y to do Z (Question 90, pg. 295, Verbal Review)

both Y and Z (Question 93, pg. 297, Verbal Review)

Y rose almost as fast as Z (Question 94, pg. 297, Verbal Review)

between Y and Z (Question 95, pg. 298, Verbal Review)

more Y than Z (Question 98, pg. 299, Verbal Review)

Y rather than Z (Question 99, pg. 300, Verbal Review)

isolated from (Question 106, pg. 303, Verbal Review)

not only Y … but also Z (Question 108, pg. 304, Verbal Review)

as a result of (Question 113, pg. 307, Verbal Review)

Parallelism Challenge Part II

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Remember our parallelism challenge cliffhanger?  You’ve discussed your thoughts in the comments section; now let’s go over this question in detail.

The recent decline in bus commuter ridership has left the system underfunded, to cause the number of buses running during peak times to drop, and prompts concerns that further service cuts may lead to the collapse of the city’s entire public transportation system.

  1. a. to cause the number of buses running during peak times to drop, and prompts
  2. b. causing the number of buses running during peak times to drop and prompting
  3. c. to cause reductions in the number of buses running during peak times and prompt
  4. d. to cause the number of buses running during peak times to be reduced, and prompted
  5. e. causing a reduction in the number of buses running during peak times and prompting

There are a couple of ways to make this parallel.  First, you could look at the three main verbs as a list: “left the system underfunded” is the first one, and since it’s not underlined, it’s the one we have to match.  In order to do that, we would need to put the other two verbs—cause and prompt—in the past tense.  That list would be “…has left the system underfunded, caused the number of buses… and prompted concerns…” But a quick scan of the answer choices shows us that none of them begin with “caused,” so we have to try a different option: we look at the underlined portion as the beginning of a modifying phrase that describes the results of the system being underfunded.  In order to introduce that kind of phrase, we need the gerund “causing,” which leaves us with only choices ‘b’ and ‘e’ to evaluate.

That’s a tougher issue, and one that isn’t governed by parallel structure.  This comes down to word choice: “causing the number… to drop” doesn’t clearly show that the number was reduced in response to an underfunded system.  “Causing a reduction…” tells us that the underfunded system resulted in the number of buses being reduced, with the implication that the reduction was a conscious decision, rather than an unforeseen consequence.

An issue that frequently comes into play with parallel structure is verb tense, as we saw in the previous question.  Let’s look at a verb tense question; note your answers and reasoning in the comments section, and we’ll examine this question in depth in an upcoming article.

The benefits of the teacher’s new academic achievement reward program are evident in the student’s grades, which increased by a full point this semester after it fell last semester.

  1. a. which increased by a full point this semester after it fell
  2. b. which had increased by a full point this semester after it had fallen
  3. c. which have increased by a full point this semester after falling
  4. d. with an increase of a full point this semester after falling
  5. e. with an increase of a full point this semester after having fallen

Parallelism Challenge Part I

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

How do your Sentence Correction skills stack up when it comes to parallel structure?  As this article explains, items in a list must be in parallel form, as must items being compared.  “Parallel” means that nouns go with nouns and verbs go with verbs.  Verbs must be in the same tense or form, and prepositions or other “helping” words must be parallel as well.  Take this GMAT-style question, for example:

The restaurant’s manager reported an increase in customers during the month of June, as much because of its business of the month before being so slow as that more tourists travel through the area in the summer.

  1. a. of its business of the month before being so slow as that
  2. b. of its business the month before having been slow as because
  3. c. of its business the month before being as slow as because
  4. d. its business the month before had been so slow as because
  5. e. its business of the month before was as slow as that

In terms of parallelism, if you choose to say “because of its business…” you will need to use the parallel phrase “as because of more tourists travel…”  And “because of more tourists travel” doesn’t make sense; therefore, we can eliminate all the choices that begin with “of,” which leaves us with only the final two choices.  The “because” immediately before the underlined portion of the sentence leaves us with no choice but to use a “because” before “more tourists.”  Choosing ‘d’ as the correct answer, we end up with a parallel phrase: “as much because x as because y.”

A more common parallelism issue is verb form.  Gerunds need to be paired with gerunds, past tense verbs with other past tense verbs, and so on.  Let’s look at an example of that issue:

The recent decline in bus commuter ridership has left the system underfunded, to cause the number of buses running during peak times to drop, and prompts concerns that further service cuts may lead to the collapse of the city’s entire public transportation system.

  1. a. to cause the number of buses running during peak times to drop, and prompts
  2. b. causing the number of buses running during peak times to drop and prompting
  3. c. to cause reductions in the number of buses running during peak times and prompt
  4. d. to cause the number of buses running during peak times to be reduced, and prompted
  5. e. causing a reduction in the number of buses running during peak times and prompting

So what do you think, Grockit readers?  Note your choice in the comments section, as well as your reasoning, and we’ll post the correct answer, as well as an explanation, in an upcoming article.

SC Spotlight: All-In-One Question 2 (Test Yourself)

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

ThinkThe last installment in this series got a good response, so a good response deserves another good question! This one is a little harder, I think, but relies on the same principle: namely, if a question testing some of the Sentence Correction issues listed in the Official Guide is a good addition to your practice arsenal, then a question testing all of them could be welcome variation and challenge. As a reminder, the stylistic, grammatical, and syntactical issue in question are:

  • Agreement
  • Diction
  • Grammatical construction
  • Idiom
  • Logical Predication
  • Parallelism
  • Rhetorical construction
  • Verb form

As always, we urge you to consult your physician before undertaking strenuous Sentence Correction exercises. This one has been made more challenging by making the wrong answers appear less obviously wrong, and the right answers appear less obviously right. Yes, you read that correctly — right answers (plural). In an effort to illustrate the variability and flexibility of sentences with heavy modification, I’ve let two correct answers creep in.

The storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned from a prison, by angry protesters on July 14, 1789 was the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and beginning a long period of turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

A. The storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned from a prison, by angry protesters on July 14, 1789 was the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and the inception of a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

B. After the revolutionary formation of the National Assembly by angry protesters, then a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe were begun by the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, on July 14, 1789, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution.

C. Angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, and the beginning of a long period of much turmoil with France and throughout Europe on July 14, 1789.

D. A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe began on July 14th, 1789 along with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, when angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly.

E. After the revolutionary formation of the National Assembly, a long period of many turmoil within France and throughout Europe were begun by the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison by angry protesters on July 14, 1789, the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution.

F. A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe had been begun July 14th, 1789 with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, when angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, an event after the dramatic formation of the National Assembly.

G. The storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison by angry protesters on July 14, 1789, was the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and likewise beginning a long period of much turmoil not only within France and throughout Europe.

H. The first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution was the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, by angry protesters on July14, 1789, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly and beginning a long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

I. A long period of much turmoil within France and throughout Europe began July 14th, 1789 with the first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution when, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, angry protesters stormed the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison.

J. The first violent event of the opening stage of the French Revolution was the storming of the Bastille, a medieval fortress turned into a prison, by angry protesters on July14, 1789, following the dramatic formation of the National Assembly, also a beginning of a long period of many turmoil within France and throughout Europe.

As before, answers and explanations in Part Two!

Evaluate the Plan Questions: Use the Skills You Already Have

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

Unlike many of the Critical Reasoning question types on the GMAT, Evaluate the Plan questions are unique to the exam; you are extremely unlikely to find them on the LSAT, which does feature most of the other question types.  Therefore, if you choose to use LSAT Critical Reasoning materials in your GMAT preparation, you’ll need to make an extra effort to seek out Evaluate the Plan questions from traditional GMAT prep sources.

The questions themselves aren’t all that different from most of what you’ll see on the test: there’s a plan (or argument, in some cases), and the question stem asks you to identify the information that would be most helpful in evaluating the plan.  This can take different forms; sometimes you’ll be asked to choose a study or research topic, for example, and other times you’ll be asked to identify the question that, when answered, would help you to evaluate the validity of the plan.  The key to answering Evaluate the Plan questions with a minimum of stress is to use the skills that you employ for Assumption, Strengthen, Weaken, and some Flaw questions: look for a gap in the reasoning.

For example, an assumption question might look like this:

Video game designers develop innovative new gaming technology in response to the demands of the market.  Only serious gamers are willing genuinely interested in innovative technology and willing to pay for it.  Therefore, the video game designers at XYZ Gaming Corp. will develop new gaming technology only if it can be used in violent car-chase video games.

Which of the following is an assumption…

The correct assumption for this question would be something like this:

Serious gamers are only interested in innovative technology that can be used in violent car-chase video games.

This assumption ties together the evidence, which discusses serious gamers, with the plan, which addresses violent car-chase video games.  But the same stimulus could be used for an Evaluate the Plan question, and the same identification of the gap in the reasoning could help us choose the correct answer.  Let’s look at the question again, from that perspective:

Video game designers develop innovative new gaming technology in response to the demands of the market.  Only serious gamers are willing genuinely interested in innovative technology and willing to pay for it.  Therefore, the video game designers at XYZ Gaming Corp. will develop new gaming technology only if it can be used in violent car-chase video games.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the validity of XYZ Gaming Corp.’s plan?

  1. a. Are violent car-chase video games popular with the “casual gamer” segment of the market?
  2. b. What percentage of serious gamers is willing to invest significant amounts of money in purchasing newly developed technology?
  3. c. Are serious gamers interested in innovative technology that can be used in games outside of the violent car-chase genre?
  4. d. On average, what percentage of the total annual video game market has been comprised of violent car-chase video games for each of the last five years?
  5. e. How would one distinguish between a serious gamer and a casual gamer?

We know from evaluating this as an assumption question that there’s a gap between serious gamers and violent car-chase video games; now we look for a question that, if answered, would allow us to determine whether or not the link between them exists.  We find that in choice C.  If the answer to C is ‘yes,’ then the assumption we identified earlier is invalid and the plan is not a solid one.  If the answer is ‘no,’ then the plan is valid.  Either way, though, the answer to the question in choice C is important in evaluating the plan.

The basic approach for Evaluate the Plan questions, then, is similar to what you’ve been doing for assumption questions; you just need to take an extra step beyond identifying the gap to finding the question or study that would help you to fill it.

Inferences on the GMAT

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

You’re having lunch with your friend Jane, and you suggest getting hot fudge sundaes for dessert; Jane tells you that she doesn’t eat hot fudge sundaes.  In real life, you could draw several valid inferences from this: she’s lactose intolerant, she has sensitive teeth and so can’t eat frozen desserts, she’s on a diet and trying to avoid sweets, or maybe she just doesn’t like ice cream or hot fudge.  In real life, those would all be acceptable inferences, because the real-world definition of infer is to do any of the following:

1. to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence: e.g., They inferred his anger from his heated denial.

2. (of facts, circumstances, statements, etc.) to indicate or involve as a conclusion; lead to.

3. to guess; speculate; surmise.

4. to hint; imply; suggest.

“Infer” is, as you can see, a word with fairly flexible meaning.  We most often use it in day-to-day life to mean “make an educated guess.”  If your friend Jane says she doesn’t eat hot fudge sundaes, you apply your existing knowledge about the possible reasons someone could have for not enjoying the hot fudge and ice cream deliciousness, and you make an educated guess as to what her reasons could be.  On the GMAT, however, “inference” has a different meaning.  Think of inferring as the process of deriving the strict logical consequences of assumed premises.

On the GMAT, therefore, if you are told that Jane doesn’t eat hot fudge sundaes, you can derive two logical consequences from that premise:

  1. If Jane is eating, has eaten, or will eat something, it isn’t a hot fudge sundae, and
  2. If someone is eating, has eaten, or will eat a hot fudge sundae, that person is not Jane.

The correct answer to an inference question on the GMAT will follow directly from the evidence provided; it is NOT merely an educated guess, but is instead the logical consequence of the assumed premises.

Notice that just based on six words—“Jane doesn’t eat hot fudge sundaes”—we can draw two possible inferences.  Now think of how many words you might see in the average GMAT question, and you’ll understand that inference questions, unlike other types of questions, don’t lend themselves well to prediction.  Trying to guess the correct inference being drawn from several sentences worth of statements is generally a waste of time.  Your best bet in approaching GMAT questions that ask for inferences is to use process of elimination, just as you would in sentence correction.  Eliminate answers that are just “educated guesses,” answers that aren’t necessarily true, answers that are too extreme, and of course, anything irrelevant.  Your answer will be the one choice that follows strictly from the statements in the question.

Let’s look at a sample GMAT-type question:

XYZ Corporation has two divisions, both of which performed consistently over the last five years.  The Interment Services Division accounted for approximately 30% of the corporation’s transactions and 50% of the corporation’s profits; the Toxic Household Products Division accounts for the balance.

The statements above support which of the following inferences about XYZ Corporation over the last five years?

  1. Measured in dollars, the total profits for XYZ Corporation have remained stable over the last five years.
  2. Interment Services is an increasingly competitive field, while Toxic Household Products are a largely untapped market.
  3. The Toxic Household Products Division yields a lower average profit per transaction than does the Interment Services Division.
  4. XYZ Corporation’s Toxic Household Products line has remained consistent over the past five years.
  5. Most families will, over a given five-year period, spend more money on Interment Services than on Toxic Household Products.

Only one of these answer choices MUST be true; let’s take a look at the options:

  1. We only know about percentages, or proportions, so we can’t draw inferences about dollar amounts.
  2. No information is provided about competition for either Interment Services or Toxic Household Products.
  3. This is the correct choice; Interment Services has a profit to transactions ratio of 50%:30%, or 5:3, while Toxic Household Products has a ratio of 50%:70%, or 5:7.  Therefore, the Toxic Household Products Division is doing more than twice as many transactions as the Interment Services Division, but yielding the same profits.
  4. Product lines are not discussed, and therefore can’t be the subject of an inference.
  5. Per-family spending is never mentioned, so we can’t infer anything about it.

There’s a pattern here: if it’s not mentioned, an inference can’t be drawn about it.  Inferences MUST be supported by the evidence provided; remembering this one concept will give you a solid start in conquering inference questions on the GMAT.